Reduce Peak 4HRA and Software MLC Costs

ThruPut Manager manages workload demand to reduce capacity utilization, based on the 4HRA, when sub-capacity pricing is used with or without capping. More »

Automate z/OS Batch

ThruPut Manager balances workload arrival, importance, and resource availability. More »

Make the most of scarce resources

Because money doesn’t grow on trees, let us lower your MSU consumption and MLC costs. More »

Make Way for Mobile

As mobile applications take up more CPU at unpredictable times, let ThruPut Manager take low importance batch out of the equation and make room for your high priority workload. More »

Country Multiplex Pricing is here

Use ThruPut Manager automation to lower your MSU baseline today and find software license savings, with or without capping, when you move to CMP. More »

Automate production control

Manage z/OS execution according to your CA 7 schedule and due-out times, ensuring automated on-time completion with minimal intervention that frees you for other valuable tasks. More »

Our Customers

ThruPut Manager installations range from individual corporate datacenters to global outsourcing providers in the major industry sectors, including banking, insurance, and government. More »


Tag Archives: sub-capacity pricing

CPU Busy: Are you looking at the right metrics?

CPU Busy metrics

Since the days when processor time was costly (and you input a job on punch cards), the CPU Busy metric has had intense focus. There are so many ways to look at the metric, all having vastly different meanings. Virtualization made it even more complicated. But for many in our field, this is still a very critical number. But is it the most important number?

Introducing LPAR sets: Save your most expensive MSUs – soft capping optional (webinar)


Many datacenters are enjoying the software savings provided by ThruPut Manager’s Automated Capacity Management (ACM) component, a safe and selective method to reduce MSU consumption and resulting MLC costs. Now, ACM introduces a significant enhancement – LPAR Sets.Monthly License Charges are implemented on a CPC basis, but each LPAR may contribute to the total in different ways with different software stacks, varying business requirements, or various MSU costs for each LPAR. We are now introducing LPAR Sets to give you more granular control over your batch workload.

Who believes the mainframe is dead?

A guest post by Denise P. Kalm – When BMC Software releases the results of its latest survey showing that 90% of the participants are confident in a long-term future for mainframes, you have to listen. Or more importantly, the management teams who keep trying to move off of it needs to read the report. While security and availability are frequently cited as important factors – who has hacked a mainframe lately – too often forgotten is the unequalled ability to manage costs on this platform.

Very often, with distributed systems, the cost is the cost; you pay for seat licenses or for the total capacity of the box or some other immutable metric. And let’s not forget the lower availability statistics, nor the fact that Wintel boxes are the biggest targets for hackers. But back to cost, because every systems programmer has had to become an active participant in managing and reducing costs. Which platform is the most flexible in terms of cost?

Roll along, safely

If you take advantage of IBM’s variable workload license charges (VWLC), you’re more than familiar with the challenges of keeping costs low. In all likelihood, due to the complexity of how the rolling-four-hour-average (R4HA) is calculated, you find out the good or bad news only after you get your bill. You probably have IMS, CICS, DB2 and more running in a variety of LPARs with demand fluctuating throughout the day. And even if you keep your eye on your monitors, looking at the online work may give you a false feeling of confidence about how well you’re managing.

Pay less for mobile workloads

Just as IBM helped customers with CPU costs by offering zIIP engines, it’s again stepping up to the plate to make the cost of mobile applications more affordable. The company’s new program, highlighted in a previous post, is designed for z/OS customers running such programs as CICS, IMS and DB2 with IBM’s new Mobile Workload Pricing program (MWP). The new program allows those implementing sub-capacity AWLC, AEWLC or zNALC to run a new tool, the Mobile Workload Reporting Tool (MWRT), which acts like SCRT but for mobile workloads.

Capacity planning: Are you proactive or reactive?

proactive capacity planning

When it was first introduced, IBM’s sub-capacity pricing was a boon for capacity planners from a financial standpoint—allowing them to be more proactive in their planning. In the pre-sub-capacity era, all upgrades had to be carefully managed because of the huge potential impact on software pricing. Now, you can right-size your hardware and worry less about software costs—until you hit a soft cap, that is.

IT super heroes of savings

A guest post by Denise P. Kalm – Super heroes abound in cinema and on TV. Batman, Superman, Iron Man and even Ant Man return on an annual basis recycling plots and themes and yet, people stream to the theater to see them again and again. Why? I think it’s because we all secretly want to be heroes in our own lives. Seeing others achieve what few can is inspiring; it makes you believe it’s possible, at least while you’re caught up in the story.

Then we go back to work. Where once, companies bought hardware on your say-so, now the pressure is on to save money and reduce costs while delivering even better performance with increasing workloads. By now, you’ve found all the easy wins–the quick-hit savings opportunities. Where else can you look? Those who can meet management’s directive to accomplish these tough goals will be IT super heroes, and you’d like to be the one who pulls it off.